Looks garbage.
Quick snoop around the source and it's the Halo trailer.
So here's another embed.
Heh, in 10 years Square made the first 7 main games. In 25 years they have made 8 main games with one being developed.
I would actually say Civ VI is closer to a board game - it's very streamlined, the differences between the civs are really minimal if you aren't doing early game PvP stuff with other humans, and almost every mechanic is pretty straightforward and easy to understand. The expansions kind of add a lot though, so getting the ultimate deluxe mega pack or whatever is recommended, and I'd even recommend modding after maybe your first game or two if you go with Civ, because frankly it still gets a lot of stuff "wrong" from a fun perspective.
It's actually 25 years since FFT came out in Japan in 1997
Yeah the problem with taking games and making movies from them is that story is often secondary to why we love games so the transfer takes away the primary thing we like about them. As you say they become "lifeless". And stories in games are rarely as good as those in movies. But with that said, I will still always watch anything that is connected to games and that seem at least a bit competently made!
To a certain extent I think that's why DOTA and League worked so well. There is no story associated to the games itself. It is all supplementary to the game. There aren't stories told while the game is played.
It's actually 25 years since FFT came out in Japan in 1997
That nvidia leak better be true, I want that f*cking PC version
I thought I knew this one from the name but looking at it, I'm thinking of some other game because that was on PS2. I wonder what that was. Gotta investigate when I get home.
The biggest difference is Narrative versus Lore.
b0tster.itch.io
www.gamesindustry.biz
heading with "yea we bought them but they're gonna stay multiplatform so basically nothing changes" is really really weird ngl
Destiny will, Totally-Not-Halo won't be.
perhaps, the "self-publish and reach players wherever they choose to play" is rather vague after all.
Bungie doesn't release new games every year like Activision tho so Sony doesn't have much leverage.
really well, at least financially. bit confused about what this means for their NetEase funded project.
All Sony has to show is that they let their new studio be Multiplatform and that puts pressure on Microsoft. Not saying it is much but its something.
Compared to Microsoft recent acquisitions (Activision Blizzard and Zenimax), this seems mehSony buying Bungie for $3.6 billion
Sony Interactive Entertainment today announced a deal to acquire Bungie for $3.6 billion, the latest in a string of big…
okay. don't care then
Only a publishing deal. No ownership.
