Whether people like it or not, a lot of people love TW3 and Gwent and think they're among the GOAT RPGs and minigames. There's also a lot of name recognition that probably leads to lazy votes like my own. I distinctly remember wanting to vote for some indie dev, couldn't find them, felt lazy and wanted to complete the awards so I got my cards or whatever, and just typed in CDPR.See I definitely am not interpreting those categories the same way. Regardless of the game itself, the environmental design of Subnautica was outstanding and very new and unique, whereas Witcher 3 (for the most part) never really stood out anywhere to me, just normal fantasy landscape as far as the eye can see. Despite my disappointment with the game, I would rate Shadow of the Tomb Raider higher as well for environment (the game itself was sub par for sure).
Similarly, while CDPR is an alright company (they do have some drama as well, just not overt evil like some), as a developer they've released 2 games over the past 4 years and one of those (Thronebreaker) was a bit of a dud, whereas Paradox / Ubisoft / Square and some others put out a ton of amazing games just past couple years. They've had some misses as well, but I would rank nearly every one of them above CDPR unless Witcher was my GOAT, which it isn't.
Honestly, yes, the whole awards thing is dumb as hell since it doesn't differentiate between games released a long time ago (e.g. TW3 getting Best Environment, which is stupid), and games released a long time ago that are GaaS (PUBG, R6S, Rocket League, etc getting awards, which in a GaaS market is distinctly less stupid).
But that said, the funny thing about people complaining is:
- Game awards are dumb as hell once more than 2-3 people are voting on them anyways, and anyone pretending they have prestige has their head entrenched in their keister. All you have to do is go watch GB's or EZA's deliberations for an hour to know that. None of these lists have any meaning whatsoever when the majority of "voters" (either in fan votes or "publication" lists) DO NOT play a significant number of the games released in a year, and most people have fairly invalidated opinions. Yes, the Steam Awards may be a magnitude of levels dumber but they're all still fundamentally dumb and worthless.
- No one has any interest in why the results might be the way they are and just want to mock them for their spicy Twitter takes. E.g., Is PUBG at the top somehow correlated to China's interest in the game? That would be interesting to research and maybe reach out to Valve to ask about participation in the voting by country, since I would assume that's a big factor. But you know it's funnier to go around being a dipshit: