Getting back to this topic, a new review popped-up on my twitter feed for the film (from rogerebert.com), and I really have to laugh, even considering I'm yet to watch the film: it's another 1 star review, from a woman that spent a big portion of the review writing the following, which I now quote:Yeah, I read a few after watching and all of them are exactly what you have described. Many people fail to understand that the 2016 reboot was badmouthed because it is a bad Ghostbuster movie, instead of anything relating to masculinity or hate towards women.
Some also bring up the point that Afterlife is too "fan servicey" and it is a negative... I mean, the original movies are like 30 something years ago, and considering what this movie really is meant to be to the franchise, they should include references to the originals. And honestly? Most of them are very minor and new audience won't even know some of these things or lines are references. These reviews are ridiculous.
Fucking age rating on this wonderful cover art.
I own a copy, and I can confirm that there's no such age rating mark on the cover. Curiously, that is the UK rating mark though.I think that's just off the website (I hope)
The new Ghostbusters in Afterlife has girls. The rhetoric they try to push is complete nonsense.Getting back to this topic, a new review popped-up on my twitter feed for the film (from rogerebert.com), and I really have to laugh, even considering I'm yet to watch the film: it's another 1 star review, from a woman that spent a big portion of the review writing the following, which I now quote:
«This is sort of a sequel and sort of a reboot, but it’s definitely an erasure of the 2016 “Ghostbusters” starring Melissa McCarthy, Kristen Wiig, Kate McKinnon and Leslie Jones, which caused such a stir because it dared to feature women busting ghosts. That’s men’s work! Women are allowed to answer the phone at Ghostbusters headquarters, and they can be possessed by an ancient demon from another dimension as long as they still look sexy, but that’s about it. Come on, guys. When Ray Parker Jr. sang that busting made him feel good, we all knew what he was really talking about. (And yes, that catchy theme song is in here, too, playing over the end credits. It’s truly bizarre in retrospect to realize that it was a massive radio and MTV hit in 1984.)»
I'm yet to watch the film, but even I know there's 2 girls (in a group of 4) in the main cast, plus the mother of the kids, and the main character is Egon's granddaughter.The new Ghostbusters in Afterlife has girls. The rhetoric they try to push is complete nonsense.
Being an Asian I find this kind of representation push is pointless and annoying as well. Not every cast has to have one woman, one black and one Asian. What characters are needed should entirely depend on when the story takes place and what kind of a story that the talents behind want to tell.People these days are less interested in the quality of a film, how's the script, and how well it's shot, and apparently all that matters is counting how many women are in the cast, how many people of a certain "minority" are in the cast, and so on.
Frankly, it's exhausting. I was someone who went to the cinema sometimes multiple times a week, and now I got a couple of times in a year.
Never once did I watch a Spike Lee film and said to myself "I need to see some white people in there". Never once did I see one of Barry Levinson's Baltimore films, taking place in Jewish neighbourhoods and families, and said to myself "it needed to have some Christians in there".Being an Asian I find this kind of representation push is pointless and annoying as well. Not every cast has to have one woman, one black and one Asian. What characters are needed should entirely depend on when the story takes place and what kind of a story that the talents behind want to tell.
I'm going to (finally) watch the new film later today (it released later in Europe than the US) in about 4 hours, and like I mentioned before I may even end up not liking it, but all these articles from a bunch of "critics" that review the new film by purely attacking it, while lauding the previous one, because they perceive the new film as an attack on women, are truly bizarre, and as a film fan infuriating. This is not film criticism. This is a bunch of hipsters mistaking film criticism, with social media posting.McKenna Grace alone on Afterlife > the 4 leads of the 2016 one.
I've even seen plenty of people saying the 2016 film is better than the originals!
I feel bad for John Cho since he is a good actor (he was great in Searching), and he definitely put on the work as Spike, but it didn't change the fact that this Hollywood adaptation is a pale imitation of the original. Think of it like FFVII R.I thought the characterisations looked decent but apparently it's bad?
I definitely recommend watching the original, it is a timeless anime that tackles the theme of existentialism without making things too bleak, unlike many western media with the same aim.I never watched the anime tho so I don't know how faithful it is but its still surprising they canned it.
I rewatched the first Matrix a few days ago, too. Great movie. The premise is so ahead of its time.Think I am going to rewatch the Matrix trilogy in preparation for the new one!
I'm watching The Matrix now and wow, how Keanu Reeves looks in the first movie.
Yeah it’s fantastic, it was as good today as the first day I saw it on release. It holds up so well.I rewatched the first Matrix a few days ago, too. Great movie. The premise is so ahead of its time.
On my way to the cinema now!Jesus Fucking Christ! I didn't know it was possible, but they did it... Lana Wachowski did it! The Matrix Resurrections is fucking unbelievable fantastic!
Just have your expectations in check and you enjoy it very much, its not a revolutonary cinematic moment, its a Matrix movie in 2021.On my way to the cinema now!
Considering how revolutionary the original matrix was, isn't it the same thing?Just have your expectations in check and you enjoy it very much, its not a revolutonary cinematic moment, its a Matrix movie in 2021.
no, because theres nothing new or revolutary in this movie, there is the same stuff that the originals had.Considering how revolutionary the original matrix was, isn't it the same thing?
Have you seen the Animatrix? I recommend it, especially The Second Renaissance. It's a pretty good companion piece to Revolution/Reloaded.Somehow I have never watched 2 and 3 before, and I am surprised to find out that they are more anime than anime
Nope. Thanks for the suggestion. Gonna find it later today.Have you seen the Animatrix? I recommend it, especially The Second Renaissance. It's a pretty good companion piece to Revolution/Reloaded.
The Animatrix - Anime - AniDB
A collection of animated short films, detailing the back story of the Matrix universe, and the original war between man and machines which led to the ...anidb.net